3 (and a half) Reasons for Climate Optimism

Why it might not be all bad


Photo by Charl van Rooy on Unsplash

You can’t turn on the news these days without seeing deadly wildfires, devastating hurricanes or record-breaking temperatures making the headlines. The seemingly never-ending cycle of negativity makes it very easy to adopt the “well, we’ve really fucked this” mentality.

But, I believe that if you wade through the negativity (and there is a lot of it), and briefly set aside the overwhelming sense of existential dread, there are a few reasons to be optimistic on climate change.

#1. Everyone is talking about it

Climate change is everywhere. Everyone is talking about it. ‘Single-use’ was even awarded word of the year for 2018. This is an enormous step in the right direction.

A few years ago climate change was littered with buzzwords like sustainability, carbon footprint and emissions but the masses did not really know, or care, what they meant. Now, even with the leaders of the U.S and Brazil in denial of the science, it is at the forefront of the international agenda.

We are constantly gaining a better understanding of both the causes and the threats of a warming world, allowing people to become more informed and make more mindful choices.

Knowledge is a prerequisite for action.

The more people that know, and understand, the dangers of a changing climate, the more people can help to reverse our current troublesome trajectory.

#2. Attitudes are changing

For a long time, it seemed as though the main message for mitigating climate change was for everyone to drive an electric vehicle and turn vegan.

While the actions clearly do help, they require very large changes in lifestyle that people are either unwilling or unable to make. The majority of people, myself included, do not have enough spare cash to buy a Tesla and I think pushing such extreme changes has actually been detrimental to the cause.

We do not need an all or nothing approach — either drive an EV and cut out meat entirely or remain exactly the same — but rather an approach that incentivises and facilitates many people to make small changes. Just like in investing, the power of compounding will be our best friend in fighting climate change.

If most people can make small adjustments to their lives, the sum of these changes in terms of emission reductions will be far greater than if a few people make extreme changes.

We are already beginning to see this. There has been a rapid rise in the ‘flexitarian’ lifestyle, allowing people the flexibility to enjoy meat when they feel like it but also being happy to make other choices.

There is an ongoing war with single-use plastic. Countless campaigns have highlighted the devastating consequences on the ocean and marine life, and there has been support from major players. Here in the UK, supermarkets charge for plastic bags and the fee is set to double, and coffee shops are giving money off for anyone that brings a reusable cup to avoid unnecessary waste.

These are only small steps, but they are progress nonetheless. MORE

What did we hear at The Pact for a Green New Deal Town Halls?

Historic floods and wildfires. The MMIWG final report linking resource extraction and violence against Indigenous women, girls, and two-spirit people. Growing economic inequality. Our government’s failure to live up to the demands of the Truth and Reconciliation committee or to fully implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. This moment of systemic crisis calls for systemic change. That’s why over 100 groups have come together in 2019 to launch The Pact for a Green New Deal.

The Pact for a Green New Deal is a coalition calling for a far-reaching plan to cut emissions in half in 11 years, in line with Indigenous knowledge and climate science; create more than one million good jobs; and build inclusive communities in the process. Its bold, justice-based vision is galvanizing thousands of people by recognizing, and working to respond to, the multiple crises we face.

Since The Pact launched on May 6, 2019, organizations in the coalition have set off with the goal of listening to people from coast to coast to coast in the ambitious project of defining what a Green New Deal looks like for their community.

In less than a month, volunteers organized an astounding 150+ town halls, taking place in every single province and territory, to build alignment towards a set of shared principles for a Green New Deal. 

Of these 150+ events, about half were held in large communities (over 100,000 people), and half in small communities (under 30,000 people). The organizers we heard from hosted town halls ranging in size from four people, in Iqaluit, to over 300 in Edmonton. All in all, more than 7,000 people joined Green New Deal town halls in their communities — representing environmental groups, labour unions, faith groups, political parties, city councils, community and neighbourhood associations, Indigenous organizations, women’s organizations, the Fight for $15 and Fairness, student unions, local media, and more.

We worked with analysts to pull themes from the town hall conversations that took place: people gathering in grief, in rage, and in hope to share what they think the Green New Deal must include, and what it must put an end to. What follows is a summary of some of those themes; it is not a complete analysis or completed report. There is much work still to be done to bring in those who did not attend town halls, to allow time to hear from other groups, and to make sure voices marginalized by the status quo are made central in the process.

Red Lines and Green Lines 

Methodology

The town hall process was not about coming to complete consensus on specific policies or finding the perfect wording, but rather creating an opportunity for thousands of people to contribute their ideas for what a Green New Deal should look like, to identify commonalities, and to start developing specific proposals.

Participants were asked to discuss their red lines and green lines: the things that absolutely should not be in a Green New Deal for Canada, and the things that people, groups, communities and institutions want — and in some cases, need — to see in a Green New Deal in order to be on board.

Participants shared an incredible 8900 red lines and green lines. There were almost three times as many green lines as red lines, suggesting that participants are eager to focus on a hopeful and positive vision of the future. Some clear themes emerged from the responses, as outlined in the following sections.

Here’s some of what we heard.

Green Lines

The town hall responses were sorted into the following twelve Green Line categories: Economy and Government, Green Infrastructure, Nature, Agriculture, Social Justice, Democracy, Plastics, Climate Science, Decent Work, Indigenous Reconciliation, Climate Debt, and Rights. Of these categories, the ones that occurred most frequently were Economy and Government, Green Infrastructure, Social Justice, and Indigenous Sovereignty. It is clear that systemic change and radical shifts are needed to transform the systems and institutions that perpetuate inequality, racism, xenophobia, and ongoing colonial violence.

Indigenous Sovereignty

A Green New Deal must include the full implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), and the 94 Calls to Action of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Participants highlighted the importance of Indigenous knowledge, and respecting Indigenous title and relationship to the land. Decolonization must go hand in hand with a Green New Deal.

Specific recommendations included:

    • Full recognition of Indigenous title and rights.
    • Fully implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent.
    • Fully implementing the 94 Calls to Action of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
    • Fully implementing the Calls for Justice in the Final Report of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls.

Economy and Government

Time and time again, we heard that transforming the economy is at the heart of solutions to environmental degradation and climate change. Town hall participants are ready for governments to lay the groundwork for this change in a wide range of ways — from carbon taxes, to subsidies for green initiatives, to public investment in renewable energy and infrastructure and fundamentally changing the priorities of the economic system itself.

Specific recommendations included:

    • Setting a legally binding climate target for Canada in line with the science of keeping global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
    • Creating millions of good, high-wage jobs through a green jobs plan, ensuring fossil fuel industry workers and directly affected community members are guaranteed good, dignified work with the training and support needed to succeed.
    • Increasing unionization and implementing workers’ rights, including at least a $15 minimum wage, pay equity, paid emergency leave, job security, protections for migrant workers, and the right to organize and unionize
    • Personal and public subsidies for greener technology, including affordable energy-efficient housing, and transportation.

Green Infrastructure

In talking about infrastructure for an equitable and sustainable society, participants named renewable energy and public housing as areas in need of urgent action.Specific recommendations included:

    • Making massive public investments in the infrastructure to build a 100% renewable energy economy – including power generation, energy efficiency, public transportation, public housing, food justice, ecological and localized agriculture, and clean manufacturing.
    • Ensuring sustainable, financially and physically accessible public transportation for everyone.
    • Prioritizing and incentivizing local renewable energy creation especially with public service buildings.

Social Justice

The climate crisis cannot be addressed in isolation. Participants made connections between environmental issues and struggles that have long been led by communities on the frontlines of racism and an extractive economy: migrants, Indigenous communities, rural towns and villages, poor and working-class people, and disabled people. Participants also noted the rising leadership of youth whose lives and futures are at stake; and who must be included at decision-making tables.

Specific recommendations included:

    • Promoting justice and equity by centering the communities marginalized by our current economy. This means addressing past and current harms to Indigenous peoples, Black communities, communities of colour, LGBTQ people, migrants, refugees, and undocumented people, rural communities, the poor, low-income workers, women, the elderly, people with disabilities, and youth.
    • Ensuring free accessible post-secondary education for all.
    • Full access to quality public services including healthcare, education, income security, housing, childcare, pharmacare, dental care, pensions, and more — for all.
    • Status for all: Permanent resident status and family unity for all migrants and refugees here, and landed status on arrival for those that arrive in the future. No detentions, no deportations.
    • Ensuring that Canada pays its fair share of the climate debt to countries in the Global South that have been impacted by practices and decisions in Canada, and ensuring that corporations based in Canada are not damaging the climate and environment elsewhere, contributing to conditions that force people to migrate (including wars, unjust mining, pollution, etc).

Red Lines

Town hall participants talked about putting a stop to the industries, institutions and practices that endanger our future and accelerate environmental destruction. Some of the Red Lines that came up discussed the fossil fuel industry, extraction and pollution, plastics, and a failing democracy.

Fossil Fuels 

Town hall participants were heavily in support of not only preventing the future growth of the fossil industry — through actions like halting the construction and expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure, and ending government subsidies — but phasing it out on a timeline in line with the demands of Indigenous knowledge and science.

Specific recommendations:

    •  A plan to fully phase out the fossil fuel industry and move to 100% renewable energy by 2040 (at the latest) must be developed and implemented (including a plan to fully support workers throughout this process).
    • Freezing the construction and/or approval of all new fossil fuel extraction and transportation projects — we cannot solve the problem if we make it worse at the same time.
    • Fossil fuel subsidies from the federal or provincial government should be immediately eliminated and redirected to support the transition to a clean economy.

Protecting Biodiversity and Nature

Participants emphasized the importance of ending water extraction, water pollution, and other activities that jeopardize the health and sustainability of the environment.

Specific recommendations included:

    • Enacting laws that grant personhood protections to our forests and bodies of water, and the creation of an environmental bill of rights.
    • Stopping the dumping of waste (civic or industrial) into bodies of water.
    • Ensuring greater protection for critical biodiversity and natural areas.
    • Collectively ensuring the right of all people to clean air, clean water, healthy food, and a safe environment built on connection and community.
    • Ensuring the protection of at least 30 percent of land and waters in Canada by 2030.

Plastics

Participants voiced support for stopping the production of single-use plastics, and advocated for the importance of ending our reliance on plastics as a society.

Specific recommendations included:

    • Developing alternatives to plastic bags, straws and other single-use plastic items to address the problem of plastic waste, while maintaining the necessary access that these items often provide.
    • Ending boil water advisories in Indigenous communities.
    • Legislating the curtailment of excessive packaging.

Democracy

Participants made systemic links between current environmental issues and the necessity of ending corporate lobbying and transforming the democratic systems and institutions that have helped to create the multiple crises we face. Participants noted they would like to see “no more first past the post elections.”

Specific recommendations included:

  • Honouring the promise of making Canada a Proportional Representation Democracy.

Next Steps:

The communities and organizations represented by people who attended town halls did reach beyond the “green bubble” that typically exists within mainstream environmental events and campaigns. That being said, there is much room for improvement in reaching out to the labour movement, social justice movements, Indigenous peoples, and those who are marginalized or who have been most impacted by the current and historical harms a Green New Deal must address.

Moving forward, consultation will continue and groups and organizations are encouraged to make submissions to this process. Many town halls have yet to be held, some groups are still preparing their own specific submissions; and so, the recommendations above should be taken as a living document that will continue to evolve and change as new voices enter the conversation.

Thank you for your words and participation. Let’s keep working to secure a Green New Deal for all.  SOURCE

Image result for green new deal for canada

Report: Investing in Canadian Climate Science

Pioneering research in atmospheric sciences, meteorology and oceanography

Investing in Canadian Climate Science

This report is centered on what we heard from Canadian climate scientists about their experiences with research funding. It identifies strengths and weaknesses in how funding is allocated to climate science and puts forth seven recommendations for strengthening the landscape of climate science in Canada and ensuring that Canada remains a global leader in the field.

We took on this project because, in the face of the climate crisis, we understand that Canadian science plays a key role in our understanding of climate change.

Canada has unique access to the Arctic and Canadian researchers have pioneered research in atmospheric sciences, meteorology and oceanography. Given this, Canada is primed to be a global leader in these fields, if we strive to support our researchers by providing them the resources and funding that they require to carry out world-class research.

Here are some of our key findings: 

  • 77% of climate scientists think that highly qualified scientists are leaving the field due to a lack of support for their work.
  • 94% of climate scientists say that they rely on foreign resources to carry out their research.
  • There is significant anxiety about the federal approach to climate science within the scientific community, with 82% of surveyed climate scientists having concerns.
  • While there has been an increase in funding for climate related research in ecology and environmental science and management, vital work in the atmospheric sciences is being neglected.
  • As one climate scientist said “The current government funding approach is not a well-considered coherent approach but rather an amalgam of funding from diverse departments.”

For the rest of the findings, and to read  seven recommendations, check out the full report.

ExxonMobil faces EU parliament ban after no show at climate hearing


The European Parliament votes on a new copyright regulation on March 26, 2019. CC-BY-4.0: European Union 2019. Source: EP

ExxonMobil faces losing its lobby privileges at the European parliament after the company failed to show up for the first hearing into climate change denial.

ExxonMobil would become only the second multinational – after Monsanto – to lose access to MEPs, parliamentary meetings and digital resources if it loses a high-level vote expected by the end of April.

The oil giant publicly supports the Paris agreement but has drawn the ire of scientists, academics and environmentalists, who accuse it of peddling climate misinformation.

The ban request is being submitted by the Green MEP Molly Scott Cato. She said: “This is the company that denied the science, despite knowing the damage their oil exploitation was causing; which funded campaigns to block action on climate and now refuses to face up to its environmental crimes by attending today’s hearing. We cannot allow the lobbyists from such corporations free access to the corridors of the European parliament. We must remove their badges immediately.” MORE

2018 was a milestone year for climate science (if not politics)

The devastation from Hurricane Michael over Mexico Beach, Fla. A massive federal report released in November warns that climate change is fueling extreme weather disasters like hurricanes and wildfires.
The devastation from Hurricane Michael over Mexico Beach, Fla. A massive federal report released in November warns that climate change is fueling extreme weather disasters like hurricanes and wildfires. AP

…Many in the [climate scientist] community met in Washington, D.C., in December at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union. “We’re not seeing cycles” in which warming is likely to go back down, says climate scientist Martin Hoerling. “We’re not seeing things that are going to revert back,” as long as greenhouse gases in the atmosphere continue to increase.

What about that idea that the climate has changed from the dawn of time? Climate scientist Stephanie Herring says sure, that’s technically true, but it misses an important difference happening now. “The current change that we are experiencing now is particularly alarming,” she says, “and that’s because in the history of human civilization the climate has never changed this rapidly.” For example, 20 of the warmest years on record around the planet occurred in the past 22 years, according to the WMO. MORE

5 takeaways from the COP24 global climate summit

The deal’s main accomplishment is that the whole world signed up, but campaigners fear it does too little to slow global warming.

KATOWICE, Poland — The point of a compromise is that all sides have to give up something to reach a deal.

The 133-page final text of the COP24 climate summit is no exception. The major accomplishment was that 196 governments agreed on arulebook to implement the 2015 Paris Agreement, but the result left bruised feelings all around.

The poorest and most vulnerable countries felt that it demanded too little of industrialized countries, developing countries had to agree on common reporting requirements to bring their climate promises into line with those of more developed countries, and the richest countries have to be more open about their financial support to those most affected by global warming.

“You cannot cut a deal with science, you cannot negotiate with the laws of physics”— Mohamed Nasheed, former president of the Maldives

And the answer to the biggest question of all — will the agreement actually help the world avoid catastrophic climate change? — is mixed at best. MORE

Climate change warning from scientists

More than 15,000 scientists issue a warning about climate change, extreme weather and global warming.

More than 15,000 scientists around the world have issued a global warning: there needs to be change in order to save Earth.

More information here